2010/6/13 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <[email protected]> > Gerard Meijssen wrote: > > Hoi, > > This is not a problem. We use the numbers that we have. We could ask > Google > > for such numbers.. They might even be willing to share them with us. > > Thanks, > > GerardM > > > > This is not only directed at you Gerard, but to all the > top-posting perverts (sorry, but I do think you are in > the minority on this issue), on the list. > > If you can't be bothered to adhere to the tested and > true conventions that ensure maximal intelligibility > of extended conversations on mailing lists, newsgroups > and talk pages on wikies, *do* at the very _minimum_ > at least truncate the messages you are replying at, to > the very minimum necessary to retain context. I confess > reading the above missive by you, Gerard, and poring over > the text below, that it allegedly is a response to, for a good > five minutes or more. I still cannot fathom which particular > bit of text -- if any -- it is a message that can be considered > to remain on topic; even remotely. > > KTHX. > > > Yours, > > Jussi-Ville Heiskanen >
Tell me, how is top-posting worse than derailing a productive thread with an off-topic rant? -- Jon Harald Søby http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
