Hoi,
Thomas that is too easy. Even when there is no corruption .... the notion
that this idea lives among our people is upsetting. It is well worth it to
be careful this in our communication. I will argue that we are not good at
getting our message out. It could get more of a priority.
Regular reporting is hard. Ask Sue for instance why she does not find the
time to provide us with monthly updates.. I am convinced that she just does
not find the time. That does not mean that it is sad that there is so little
coming out of the office in the way of information. I believe that with more
information we will not make this feeling go away; I do believe that our
proceedings become less opaque.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 14 July 2010 17:20, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14 July 2010 16:13, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And I am completely fine with treating my points as unfounded.
>
> Ok, then this discussion is over. There is no point us wasting our
> time discussing unfounded accusations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
