> So? Is every single rule on Wikipedia completely determined by NPOV? As to the best of my understanding Each and every single rule on Wikipedia is completely determined by WP:5P (and NPOV is one of them) in sense that no rule may contradict to 5P.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Andre Engels <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:25 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 16 July 2010 17:58, Excirial <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If a culture sees these images as highly offensive, and if the main >>> complement of editors / readers agrees with this i wouldn't object to such a >>> rule, as long as it remained in their local Wiki, with no attempts to force >>> it on other wikipedia's. Every culture has its own inherent bias towards >>> certain topics, and i don't believe that we should try to enforce a certain >>> "Morale" on other people - in other words, country specific Wikipedia's >>> should be granted some lenience in setting their own rules. >> >> >> No, that's completely incorrect. Wikipedias are per language, not per >> country, and no country owns the wiki in its language. Neutral point >> of view is not local point of view. > > So? Is every single rule on Wikipedia completely determined by NPOV? > If not, then there apparently is some leeway, some possibility of > having different rules. And if that is the case, then isn't the > Wikipedia thing to do to have those be decided by the local community? > > > -- > André Engels, [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
