Andre, I personally don't have a problem with the mere existence of the template. I have a huge problem with it appearing at the top of the mainpage of a Wikipedia.
-m skype: node.ue On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Andre Engels <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:14 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That there is ambiguity at the edges does not disprove NPOV. Day fades >> into night, but they're different things. This template is blatant >> advocacy to violate NPOV, and indeed to do so across all Wikimedia >> sites. They had it up on the main page, too. > > So? Apparently the fact that there exists some template that is not > NPOV means that we should be forcing our morals on others and not > give them any leniency? > >> It's reasonably clear that there is a deep and serious discussion very >> much needed regarding neutral point of view on ace:wp. > > And because there is a problem with neutral point of view somewhere we > should forbid everyone to make a choice for their own? > > -- > André Engels, [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
