I don't think any community, even one from a majority Muslim nation, could reasonably consider following the doctrine of a particular Islamic sect with no other considerations "neutral". Anyone who things "neutral point of view" means "consider the ONE ACCEPTABLE POINT OF VIEW TO US AS INDIVIDUALS" is barking.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Pavlo Shevelo <[email protected]>wrote: > Oh well, if any community is completely free to define what is neutral... > :( > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Prodego <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are some constraints on what is written - it is supposed to be a > > neutrally presented encyclopedia. But if a particular wiki's community > comes > > to a different conclusion than another on what is neutral than another, > who > > is to say which one is "right"? 'What is neutral?' is one of the > > things collaborative editing is supposed to determine. > > > > Prodego > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
