Excirial wrote: > *Do you not see the irony in requesting that someone stops using words, > taken to be a personal attack, whilst at the same time defending the > continued publication of images taken to be personal attacks on others > religious beliefs.* > > I see the irony that someone speaks out against personal attacks, while at > the same time deeming that he himself has a right to make them. I just > wonder what the bigger irony is - someone speaking out against all perceived > personal attacks while *granting himself* an exemption to do as he pleases, > or someone speaking out against censorship while applying the same rules and > thoughts indiscriminate.
Have you not worked out that you are being give a taste of your own dog food. That you find it slightly unpleasant is not really surprising. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
