On 16 September 2010 21:53, Peter Damian <[email protected]> wrote:
> No I meant 'educational'. I'm actually quite shocked by some of the things > being said in this thread, and that the people who have said them are > running Wikipedia. > Does anyone else, apart from these two, have any views on what they have > said? The WMF goal is about "collecting and developing educational > content". Does that mean 'education' in the sense I have characterised it? > I.e. bringing to the public subjects that are generally not ephemeral or > trivial, and which are enduring and a monument to the human spirit, and > generally noble and good, in a way that is interesting and accessible? > I would be interested in other people's views. Is it possible that, as a multiply sockpuppeting banned user, you just actually don't understand Wikipedia in any regard whatsoever? - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
