We have heard this type of criticism before, that lower-prestige varieties or languages that are not "official" or "national" languages are somehow intrinsically incapable or unsuited to encyclopedic writing. Article quality on a Wiki is not high or low due to some intrinsic characteristic or trait of the language variety used, it is a result of the content not being well-developed. Also, many languages in a relatively small territory does not mean living in a ghetto; on the contrary, count how many national languages there are in Europe, then count how many across all of Latin America, then take a look at economic indicators and you'll see that there is no necessary correlation between linguistic diversity and poverty.
-m. On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > I suppose you may be interested: > http://espresso.repubblica.it/dettaglio/el-me-aristotil/2134379/18 > But, don't expect it to be an actual usable judgement about those > projects, because it's more like a pretext to comment some recent > Italian events. > A Google translation to English contains "only" 2-3 completely wrong > sentences. > > Nemo > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
