The following message was rejected by moderators, but I think it is worth noting on this list.
Whether 'we' like it or not, Gregory Kohs is asking probing questions and ignoring him is not making him go away; quite the contrary actually. http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/gregory-kohs ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gregory Kohs <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:20 AM Subject: Re: Help Beat Jimmy! (The appeal, that is....) To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <[email protected]> Unfortunately, neither Philippe Beaudette nor Jay Walsh would respond to the question about competitive bidding for this important study of WMF donors, so the article in Examiner.com ran without their comment. (Note, according to Alexa.com, Examiner receives more Internet reach than Business Week, Time Magazine, or CBS News.) http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikimedia-foundation-wires-biased-study-of-donors I begin to wonder if actively ignoring journalists' requests for interviews (not even giving a courteous "we have no comment") is really the best strategy for the WMF to address even low-level criticisms of business practices at the non-profit organization? Greg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
