But then we have the following contradicting statements (and both are
yours):
1. a Wikipedia is granted to a language not a country
2. the Moldovan language is in fact the Romanian language (the fact
that it's written in Cyrillic is as relevant as proposing a
project for English written in Thai)
So then, which *language* is this about?
Gutza
On 13-Oct-10 04:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> The solution of a dissolution of the mo.wikipedia is in the recognition that
> it is Romanian language written in Cyrillic. This is the central argument
> and, consequently the Romanian language is part of an acceptable solution.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 13 October 2010 03:34, Gutza <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 13-Oct-10 04:29, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>>> Remember, a Wikipedia is granted to a language not a
>>> country.
>> True. But which language is this about, specifically?
>>
>> Gutza
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
