Milos, I'm not proposing turning ro.wiki to ro-latin-and-cyrl.wiki. I'm proposing a gadget that would seamlessly transliterate to Cyrillic *and back to Latin again, if possible* -- that way everybody reads in their own script, and (if possible) writes in their own script, while the database remains 100% in Latin.
I do not envisage any support whatsoever for a solution that would involve articles written in Cyrillic on ro.wiki -- that would be several degrees worse than the (already annoying) status quo. Gutza On 13-Oct-10 17:59, Milos Rancic wrote: > > According to Gerard's and my positions, that would be fully acceptable > solution; with a couple of pages which you should write at ro.wp for > users from Transnitria: how to edit pages in both scripts (I don't > think that you would mind for probably less than 1% of articles > written in Cyrillic after 10 years of the conversion engine > implementation), how to report bugs (mostly for Latin->Cyrillic > conversion) and similar. And, of course, it is needed that ro.wp > community express clear support for that solution. > > In that case, LangCom's suggestion to the Board would be that after > the implementation of the conversion engine, mo.wp should be removed. > > The implementation for this idea would take some time, but we would > finally know the path for the solution. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
