> Precisely my feeling on this. I just recently read that out of over 40 > studies on something, only ~7 claimed they had no ill side effects (6 of > those being FDA tests). I don't remember where I saw it, but that is > basically how it was, I think. It is common knowledge that manufacture > funded research is much less critical, and sometimes the results are > totally > different from what the recipients experience. That is probably why > people > thought it would be bad-mouthing to say that the manufacture funded the > research.
>From PLoS Medicine: "Relationship between Funding Source and Conclusion among Nutrition-Related Scientific Articles" http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0040005 A slight change in emphasis but making the point. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
