Does not work for me,, because it unreasonably implies that references without it are not so funded.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:56 AM, FT2 <[email protected]> wrote: > Works for me. > > FT2 > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I think you have hit the nail on the head. Now we just need to drive it >> > in >> > the rest of the way. >> >> >> >> >> These ethics standards serve the ideal of communicating reliable >> >> knowledge to readers. This is one of the ideals that the Foundation was >> >> built upon. They are also expressly designed to protect and enhance the >> >> reputation of the publication that provides this information. While our >> >> reputation will never be able to compare to those of top medical >> >> journals, >> >> I see no reason why we should fail to take reasonable and feasible >> >> steps to >> >> protect it to the extent that we can, following the example of the best >> >> sources. >> >> >> >> Andreas >> >> >> >> So, disclosure of funding source when available, included in >> Template:Cite journal >> >> Fred >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
