On 20 December 2010 09:35, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote: > >>>> There can be no viable >>> alternative to Wikipedia. > >> What? > > > This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at > this stage for someone to be a better Wikipedia than Wikipedia. So > anyone else wanting to do a wiki of educational information has to > either (a) vary from Wikipedia in coverage (e.g., be strongly > specialised) (b) vary from Wikipedia in rules (e.g., not neutral, or > allow original research) or (c) have a small bunch of people who want > to do a general neutral encyclopedia that isn't Wikipedia and who will > happily persist because they want to (e.g., Knowino, Citizendium). > (Any cases I've missed there?) >
Have the goverment of the largest community for a given language block wikipedia for a number of years (Hudong). -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
