On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 18:10, George Herbert <[email protected]> wrote: > I object to the GA/FA/etc requirement. There are a lot of content > editors out there who won't go near the FA mafia. > > I use that term carefully, and hopefully without inciting a great > backlash. The people involved in the GA/FA etc process are welcome as > far as I am concerned to keep doing what they're doing, but I don't > want membership in that community to be a gatekeeper requirement for > other participation. > GA is a very open process. It just takes one person to give a positive review and an article is promoted. It isn't a major hurdle in the way FA can be, and the proposed parameters for the Credo accounts (when I last saw them) included a willingness to nominate an article for GA or FA within the next 12 months, which is barely a hurdle at all.
Sarah _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
