>> I object to the GA/FA/etc requirement. There are a lot of content >> editors out there who won't go near the FA mafia. >> >> I use that term carefully, and hopefully without inciting a great >> backlash. The people involved in the GA/FA etc process are welcome as >> far as I am concerned to keep doing what they're doing, but I don't >> want membership in that community to be a gatekeeper requirement for >> other participation. >> > GA is a very open process. It just takes one person to give a positive > review and an article is promoted. It isn't a major hurdle in the way > FA can be, and the proposed parameters for the Credo accounts (when I > last saw them) included a willingness to nominate an article for GA or > FA within the next 12 months, which is barely a hurdle at all. > > Sarah
Guys, sometimes you talk (and behave) like only English Wikipedia exists and nothing else. Cheers Yaroslav _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
