Ah, sorry, I missed the point that it was on the Wikipedias solely as a
Commons POTD, and that it hadn't been selected by the wikipedias
themselves.
On 16 May 2011 10:10 PM, "Robert Rohde" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/5/16 David Richfield <[email protected]>:
>> How on earth can this become the POTD on any Wikipedia? It's
>> tolerably well executed art, but utterly non-notable.
>
> The Commons Picture of the Day process allows photos / illustrations
> of a very high technical quality to be promoted even if they have no
> claim to notability at all. In general, "notability" has very little
> to do with Commons at any level.
>
> -Robert Rohde
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
