On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Thomas Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. I would agree that image is the other side of the line and into > pornography. > > Tom Morton > > On 16 May 2011, at 23:22, Dan Rosenthal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I feel like this image from the same author: >> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Futanari.png might be crossing the >> lines. Given Niabot's user page loudly railing against Commons being >> "censored", I'd say the issue is less "art" and more "lets see who we can >> shock and/or piss off." >>
Allow me to disagree. While it would be hard for me to actually see this Futunari image get to the front page (I'm prudish that way), I actually "learned" something from it (had no clue what Futunari was all about, now I know). Which is far from being the case with that "On the edge - free world version" image, which brought me absolutely nothing except a rather puzzled wtf? Delphine -- @notafish NB. This gmail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails will get lost. Intercultural musings: Ceci n'est pas une endive - http://blog.notanendive.org Photos with simple eyes: notaphoto - http://photo.notafish.org _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
