> They won't. Most reputable news sources are not interested in kiss and > tell and there are other ones that are in place for really rather good > reasons to the point where breaking them would probably get you sued > for libel under even US law >
Heh, what news do you read! > > > Then, of course, the material will be in the article even if there is > still > > an outstanding superinjunction > > What we've actualy got however is an argument over what is considered > a reputable news source. > > Almost all of the content is trivial tabloid content of little interest... the injunctions give it a minor twist but probably not enough to invalidate the other BLP issues. So other than if the financial times splashed it across their front page I doubt any of the stuff hidden by super-injunction is worth having in the articles. Tom/ErrantX _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
