> On 20 May 2011 17:37, Chris Keating <[email protected]> wrote: >> It won't be too long before a reputable news source covers the whole >> issue - >> or indeed a British Parliamentarian raises it under parliamentary >> privilege. > > They won't. Most reputable news sources are not interested in kiss and > tell and there are other ones that are in place for really rather good > reasons to the point where breaking them would probably get you sued > for libel under even US law > >> Then, of course, the material will be in the article even if there is >> still >> an outstanding superinjunction > > What we've actualy got however is an argument over what is considered > a reputable news source. > > -- > geni
Actually no, the information is generally an invasion of privacy, and is oversightable on that basis, but see Arnold_Schwarzenegger#Infidelity Sometimes there is no point. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
