Nathan, there is no reason to single out Beria. She at least responded to the questions. There are a lot of people reading this who didn't and have far more authority to comment on the matter than her.
Theo On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > Beria, I don't think your views on transparency as stated mesh all > that well with the character of this list. I'd suspect the same is > true of the wider community of editors and donors; the assertion that > details be discussed in private is both improper and at distinct odds > with the history of the WMF. If chapters prefer that their actions not > be subject to the oversight of the WMF and Wikimedia community, then > they should do their own fundraising and develop their own trademarks. > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Béria Lima <[email protected]> wrote: > > If they do revoke (which they can, because do report are part of Chapter > > Agreement), will be also a private discussion. I do understand your > people > > curiosity to know what they discusses, but all the relevant info are > public. > > Only particular details are handle in private > > _____ > > *Béria Lima* > > <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 > > > > *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter > livre > > acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a > > fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.* > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
