Hello MZM, thanks for taking a start at new pages to illustrate the discussion on Meta.
MZMcBride <[email protected]> writes: > I fail to see how violating the community's principles of transparency and > accountability by keeping everything on a non-public list is any better. I > just hope nobody's discussing anything too private there... There are dozens of posts in the relevant threat on internal-l. Nothing especially private; I expect it will all be discussed here on f-l as well. I will publish any of my own thoughts in foundation-l threads or on meta. > Anyone who thinks that this particular issue > is outside of this list's scope is insane. Using internal-l as a substitute > for an open discussion isn't appropriate or in line with Wikimedia's values. Internal-l is, among other things, a place for chapters to discuss chapter-internal topics in a slightly quieter forum. I would prefer for it to be a world-readable group-writeable list, since I see few reasons for truly private discussions about movementwide issues... but as long as we have internal-l as currently designed, this topic seems appropriate there too. SJ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
