Ziko van Dijk, 04/09/2011 14:26: > I would like to know: Is the introduction of WMF people on national > boards a serious idea, or is it just a whim, a piece of loud thinking, > and does not need to be discussed further?
If you're quoting me on purpose, I'd say it belongs to the realms of scholastic hypothesis (worth rejecting) and surrealism; if you agree you can safely ignore the first two paragraphs of my message. ;-) Nemo > 2011/9/4 Federico Leva (Nemo) >> I've been following the WMF Brasil office activities on Meta for several >> months now (almost a year) and I don't understand completely how local >> activities have been organized and what impact they had so far, so I >> don't know what's the best approach, but the letter by Wikimedia Brasil >> is very good in its approach if not in the details. To actually involve >> the local community and chapter in the activities, besides generic >> transparency which often doesn't actually give room to useful feedback, >> we could imagine something like an advisory board or scientific >> committee (not executive), appointed by the local chapter (and which >> could just be the chapter board of trustees, to start with), which would >> assist and somehow oversee the local office, with frequent reciprocal >> reports and feedback at least. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
