On 5 September 2011 11:02, Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/09/2011 10:55 AM, Andrew Gray wrote: > > As to why no-one is distributing a "filtered" version of Wikipedia, I > > think that falls more under the general heading of "where are the > > major third-party reusers that anyone actually cares about?" - the > > non-existence of a commercial filtered version is less of a surprise > > when we consider the dearth of commercial packaged versions at all... > > You'd think a "safe" version would be a valuable service that many would > be willing to pay for, given the hordes of people beating down our doors > demanding just that... > > oh, wait. > > They already exist, and have for years. We call them "mirrors. Risker/Anne _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
