On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 14:17, Achal Prabhala <[email protected]> wrote: > This is an excellent idea. However, to cut down on frivolous closure > requests, will you also make more explicit on the page (within the > policy) that requests for closure can *no longer* be based upon > inactivity alone? My understanding is that langcom has quite a lot to > take care of anyway, and this will simply forestall irrelevant requests > that cause inadvertent panic, like in the case of Sesotho and Xitsonga > recently.
Is this better? http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Closing_projects_policy&action=historysubmit&diff=2889814&oldid=2850521 _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
