On Saturday 10 September 2011 06:07 PM, Milos Rancic wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 14:17, Achal Prabhala<[email protected]> wrote: >> This is an excellent idea. However, to cut down on frivolous closure >> requests, will you also make more explicit on the page (within the >> policy) that requests for closure can *no longer* be based upon >> inactivity alone? My understanding is that langcom has quite a lot to >> take care of anyway, and this will simply forestall irrelevant requests >> that cause inadvertent panic, like in the case of Sesotho and Xitsonga >> recently. > Is this better? > http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Closing_projects_policy&action=historysubmit&diff=2889814&oldid=2850521
Yes indeed. Many thanks! > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
