Are you kidding? Pictures of mummies, a cup with a depiction of two guys doing it that can only be noticed if you look really closely, and what is supposed to be a depiction of intercourse but actually looks more like a piece of stale bread? Wow.
2011/9/13 Fae <[email protected]> > > Are there are pages on English Wikipedia that should be classified as PG? > > Good candidates that I have had a hand in improving are: > # [[Gebelein predynastic mummies]] - surely gruesome close-ups of > naked dead bodies are PG? > # [[Warren Cup]] - explicit depiction of under-age homosexual anal sex > in the lead. > # [[Ain Sakhri lovers]] - depiction of penetrative heterosexual > intercourse in the lead. > > The discussion of how to make Wikipedia "child-friendly" has a long > history with no firm conclusion. Some would like to effectively censor > massive areas of history and culture, whilst others will take any > potential restriction as a direct challenge to the open movement. > > Cheers, > Fae > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
