2011/9/13 M. Williamson <[email protected]>: > Are you kidding? Pictures of mummies, a cup with a depiction of two guys > doing it that can only be noticed if you look really closely, and what is > supposed to be a depiction of intercourse but actually looks more like a > piece of stale bread? Wow.
+1 I really hope that Wikimedia will never censor this kind of stuff... Yann > 2011/9/13 Fae <[email protected]> > >> > Are there are pages on English Wikipedia that should be classified as PG? >> >> Good candidates that I have had a hand in improving are: >> # [[Gebelein predynastic mummies]] - surely gruesome close-ups of >> naked dead bodies are PG? >> # [[Warren Cup]] - explicit depiction of under-age homosexual anal sex >> in the lead. >> # [[Ain Sakhri lovers]] - depiction of penetrative heterosexual >> intercourse in the lead. >> >> The discussion of how to make Wikipedia "child-friendly" has a long >> history with no firm conclusion. Some would like to effectively censor >> massive areas of history and culture, whilst others will take any >> potential restriction as a direct challenge to the open movement. >> >> Cheers, >> Fae _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
