On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > David Gerard, 21/09/2011 14:00: >> The board resolution specifies a magical flying unicorn pony that >> shits rainbows. A wide-ranging survey has been conducted on the >> precise flight patterns and the importance of which way round the >> rainbow spectrum goes. These tiresome people who keep calling this >> "impossible" just do not understand that the high-level decision for a >> magical flying unicorn pony that shits rainbows has been set in stone. > > Not to mention that they've proved the Peano axioms to be inconsistent, > probably making Kim's note pure nonsense: > > Kim Bruning, 21/09/2011 12:41: > > [1] For ease of use, we'll allow the laws of physics to also stand in > > for mathematics and logic. (This is a permissable shortcut: If we > > ask a computing system in the physical universe to compute impossible > > maths or logic, it will fail in some manner) > >
For good measure, we can do non-linear computations to order... -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
