Am 21.09.2011 16:43, schrieb Milos Rancic: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 15:16, David Gerard<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 21 September 2011 14:14, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> The real problem here is that if there was a real market for stupid >>> sites like that, they would already be there. And they are not, which >>> does seem to point to the conclusion that there isn't a real market >>> for such sites. Doesn't it? >> Look, the magical flying unicorn pony and the rainbows it shits have >> been specified, and considerable donors' money *will* be spent on the >> task, and that's all there is to it. The volunteers will just have to >> shape up and participate. > They want that censoring tool and I think that they won't be content > until they get it. Thus, let them have it and let them leave the rest > of us alone. Let them create, manage and pay for it themselves. I don't like the idea to spend money for censorship and to see angry/busy admins that have no time for the users, just because some guys are holding editwars in a war that no one can win through argumentation.
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
