On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> wrote: >> None of the >> discussions of the Qimron case seem to mention the issue of date of >> publication. The argument seems to have hinged almost entirely on the >> issue of originality. > > The Qimron case is completely irrelevant with regard to the copyright > of the images. It is a case about the *text*.
If WMF wants to copy *the text* of the scrolls, I don't think anyone is going to have a problem with that. The copyright notice claims copyright "in the digital images of the manuscripts", not in the text. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
