2011/10/4 Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org>: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>> None of the >>> discussions of the Qimron case seem to mention the issue of date of >>> publication. The argument seems to have hinged almost entirely on the >>> issue of originality. >> >> The Qimron case is completely irrelevant with regard to the copyright >> of the images. It is a case about the *text*. > > If WMF wants to copy *the text* of the scrolls, I don't think anyone > is going to have a problem with that. The copyright notice claims > copyright "in the digital images of the manuscripts", not in the text. > There's no copyright over text, that is public domain for sure.
Aubrey _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
