On 10/04/11 3:14 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > WereSpielChequers, 04/10/2011 23:46: >> If someone tried to use this law >> to >> force an editor to publish a rebuttal of something posted before the >> freeze, then surely that would be retrospective legislation? > I don't see why. Web pages are permanent, they ask the > correction/declaration to be published after the new law (there's no > time limit for it) and you have to publish it. You're not punished for > having published the original text. > > And, of course, if someone has forced the site to publish its POV version, someone with an opposing POV must have the same right.
Ray _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
