On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:57 AM, ??? <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16/10/2011 19:36, Tobias Oelgarte wrote: > > Am 16.10.2011 16:17, schrieb ???: > >> On 16/10/2011 14:50, David Gerard wrote: > >>> On 16 October 2011 14:40, ???<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Don't be an arsehole you get the same sort of stuff if you search for > >>> > >>> Presumably this is the sort of quality of discourse Sue was > >>> complaining about from filter advocates: provocateurs lacking in > >>> empathy. > >>> > >> > >> Trolling much eh David? > >> > >> > >> But thanks for showing once again your incapacity to acknowledge that > >> searching for sexual images and seeing such images, is somewhat > >> different, from searching for non sexual imagary and getting sexual > images. > >> > > I have to agree with David. Your behavior is provocative and > > unproductive. I don't feel the need to respond to your arguments at all, > > if you write in this tone. You could either excuse yourself for this > > kind of wording, or we are done. > > > > > Now you wouldn't be complainng about seeing content not to your liking > would you. What are you going to do filter out the posts? Bet your glad > your email provider added that option for you. > > Yet another censorship hipocrite. > > > I think he meant ignoring you, "I don't feel the need to respond to your arguments at all". Which has also been an argument against the filter, I don't see anything hypocritical in that. Regards Theo _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
