For reference, the resolution said:
* We ask the Executive Director, in consultation with the community, to
develop and implement a personal image hiding feature that will enable readers
to easily hide images hosted ***on the projects*** that they do not wish to
view, either when first viewing the image or ahead of time through preference
settings. We affirm that no image should be permanently removed because of this
feature, only hidden; that the language used in the interface and development
of this feature be as neutral and inclusive as possible; that the principle of
least astonishment for the reader is applied; and that the feature be visible,
clear and usable on ***all Wikimedia projects*** for both logged-in and
logged-out readers.
This doesn't look like Commons is exempt from that, but perhaps the Board might
like to clarify that point.
Andreas
>________________________________
>From: Thyge <[email protected]>
>To: Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]>; Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
><[email protected]>
>Sent: Monday, 17 October 2011, 2:59
>Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content
>
>2011/10/17 Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]>:
>> Commons featured prominently in the Harris study, as well as the board
>> resolution on controversial content.
>
>Indeed, but featured curation on Commons, not filtering Commons. IMHO
>the filter discussion should concentrate on the other projects and
>treat Commons differently and separately.
>
>Sir48/Thyge
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
