Never tryed in en.wiki, but in PT.wiki we even have a 15 radom articles selection to see the quality of pt.wiki articles in a small scale.
He did it 5 times from 2005 to 2008, and I never saw a sex article on it. In fact we used to joke that pt.wiki is made only by French villages and asteroids (because EVERYONE get one of them in their 15 articles) ;) You people can see it all here: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Indech/15_artigos_aleat%C3%B3rios _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.* On 18 October 2011 15:02, Lodewijk <[email protected]> wrote: > I would guess that the odds of arriving at such article are so low, that it > would not be worth the huge discussion it would definitely result into, to > make this change because there is barely any improvement. Have we ever > received complaints from people who arrived at such articles after pressing > the random article button? > > Best, > lodewijk > > No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 16:00, Fae <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > Rather than filtering the unreferenced, I had in mind articles such as > > [[Human penis]] and [[Vagina]] where the lead may be NSFW (Tom's main > > thrust) or unstable articles that are currently locked due to > > edit-warring, blatant lobbying or similar. > > > > Cheers, > > Fae > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
