Lodewijk, 18/10/2011 16:02:
> I would guess that the odds of arriving at such article are so low, that it
> would not be worth the huge discussion it would definitely result into, to
> make this change because there is barely any improvement.

I agree. Just to say, I'm more worried by this problem: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudorandom_number_generator :-p

Nemo

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to