2011/11/4 David Richfield <[email protected]>: >>> I'd disagree. Newbie treatment is important, but having quarter of a >>> million articles without a single reference is also important given WP:V.
>> It's also valuable to avoid giving undue weight to WP:V. > My opinion (and it's just an opinion) is that it's really hard to give > undue weight to WP:V. "WP:V" is not equal to verifiability itself. You may have adminitis. I think verifiability carries a lot of weight. WP:V is different from verifiability in various important ways, which have been discussed on this list before - Wikipedia's epistemology breaks down really badly and stupidly at the edges. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
