On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Andre Engels wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Tobias Oelgarte > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The problem starts at the point where the user does not choose the > > image(s) for himself and uses a predefined set on what should no be > > shown. Someone will have to create this sets and this will be > > unavoidably a violation of NPOV in the first place. > > No, why would it? What does it say if someone created such a set? > "These are pictures of such-and-so, and there might be people who do > not want to see pictures of such-and-so." I don't see the NPOV here. > Nobody is saying "These pictures should not be seen". They are saying, > "some people would not like to see these pictures". That's not POV.
I thought we were past this point in the discussion, and working towards common consensus. Here's the key argument from a "fellow traveller"[1] kind of organisation, to help you catch up. :-) http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=interpretations&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=8657 sincerely, Kim Bruning [1] Am I using this term right? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
