On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Andreas K. <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Tom Morris <t...@tommorris.org> wrote: >
>> >> I find it highly unconvincing and wrote an extended blog post on the >> topic a while back: >> >> http://blog.tommorris.org/post/11286767288/opt-in-image-filter-enabling-censorware >> >> > > > I found that a very entertaining, well-argued, and salient post. > While I don't find that line of argument to be a fully fledged straw-horse argument, it does appear to me to be a cherry-picked argument to *attempt* to refute. There are much stronger arguments, both practical and philosophical, at any attempt to elide controversial content. Even as such, I am not convinced by the argumentation, but would not prefer to rebut an argument that does not address the strongest reasons for opposing elision of controversial content, by choice or otherwise. -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
