On 10 March 2012 22:15, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
> The image filter may not be a good solution, but too much of the > response involves saying "we're fine, we're neutral, we don't need to > do anything" and leaving it there; this isn't the case, and we do need > to think seriously about these issues without yelling "censorship!" > any time someone tries to discuss the problem. There are theoretical objections, and then there are the actual objectors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Gay_pornography The objector here earnestly and repeatedly compares the words "gay pornographic" in *text* on the page to images of child pornography. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
