<quote who="Bill Haneman"> > Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > I'm saying no because in the general case, it's not basic agreement that > > is the problem, it's the finality and commitment of execution that is. > > Even on this particular issue, there was broad agreement among board > > members (in the past) that a smaller board would be more capable of > > making quick decisions, > > I don't agree that there was broad agreement, and I was on the Board at > the time.
Note: "there was broad agreement among board members (in the past) that a smaller board would be more capable of making quick decisions". That does *not* imply that there was absolute consensus to go ahead and reduce the number of directors - obviously, because that's the bloody problem! - Jeff -- UbuntuBelowZero in Montreal! http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBelowZero "I look forward to someday putting foo-colored ribbons on my homepage declaring 'port 25 is for spam', and 'just say no to the Spam Message Transmission Protocol!'" - Raph Levien _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
