>> Traditionally, the questions are collection from interested parties >> and, an individual from the Membership and Elections Committee posts >> it in public so as to allow the candidates to frame responses and, >> respond. >> >> A wiki page could form the basis of a collection, sorting, sifting and >> finalizing of questions I guess. > > Right; I didn't mean to second-guess the elections team (who have done > a great job as usual) but just to suggest an alternative that has > worked for other groups. >
I believe that a wiki page is a lot more efficient. Please post your questions here : http://live.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/Elections2009/ProposedQuestions 1) Read existing questions and complete/rephrase them instead of just adding a new question. 2) Each question should have an unique number (positive integer in the arab notation, for the sake of simplicity). If a question has subquestion, use a), b), 3) Don't change the number of a question, even if you delete a previous question. Unfortunatly, it looks like my network doesn't want me to access live.gnome anymore. I was in the process of creating the page but cannot save it so please start without me and copy/paste those rules on it. (reading it, I see that my mail sounds a bit autoritative which is not intended as it'i more a proposition to make the job of everybody easier) Thanks, :-) Lionel (lazyman from the membership-committee) _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
