Hi, I'm not a Foundation member, but I would like to do some suggestions:
> > The GNOME Foundation believes in free software and promotes free software > > but > > that does not mean that GNOME is anti-proprietary software. We believe, > > promote, use and write free software. This is a self contradictory statement. Free software was born to replace proprietary software. I.e. GNOME was born to replace KDE when it was dependent by QT. But anti-proprietary is a bad word, it miss the point that is propositive, not negative. I thik that a good statement should be: "The GNOME Foundation believes in free software and promotes it as a reliable alternative* to proprietary software." * or "a reliable replacement" > Sometimes those companies are > > proprietary software companies Most of main software companies are not only-proprietary software companies, i.e. Google, Oracle/SUN, Intel, etc. A statement like this: "Sometimes those companies products proprietary software too, and while ...." is more accurate. ________________________________________________________________________ GUIDO IODICE [email protected] http://guiodic.wordpress.com http://www.linuxqualityhelp.it ________________________________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
