On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:22:14 -0500 "Jason D. Clinton" <m...@jasonclinton.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 13:45, Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > People asked to have their blogs included on it and placed them on > > it by choice. It's under CC-NC licensing (*). So they've agreed to NC use > > but the foundation exploiting it commercially (or indeed any site > > reformatting it and making money from doing so) would appear to be a > > breach of copyright. > > We have agreed to an grant a copy of our blogs under no license > whatsoever; it's a one-time grant of copy, non-transferable as long as > we agree to continue to be aggregated. We are not implicitly licensing > anything. > > The Foundation cannot grant a license to anyone else because it has none. Then I suggest the web site is fixed because it says very clearly: "This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0." at the bottom of various pages, which sounds to me like a fairly explicit grant of rights to the work. Alan _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
