Hi Asoka, Your file is very good representative of my topology design. Can we use it not only for VLL and BGP/MPLS which is using VRF ?
Any comparison about VPLS and BGP/MPLS ? I mean on NetIron MLX/XMR. I think we can compare them about performance and scalability based on how much VPN clouds can be subscribed. Best regards, On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Asoka De Saram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, take a look at the attached solution guide. (P) routers are not required > at all. (PE) routers do all the heavy lifting. All routers in this design are > (PE) routers connected in a L2 metro ring. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Lazuardi Nasution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 2:22:52 PM > Subject: [f-nsp] MPLS without P Router > > Hi, > > Anyone has experience with deploying MPLS but without putting any > Provider (P) Router ? Let assume that there are only small numbers of > NetIron MLX/XMR Routers act as Provider Edge (PE) Router and which are > connected as a L2 Ring. > > Best regards, _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
