Actually no, I use bgp and the secondary router only has a single circuit while the primary has multiple providers. So while we have a network that needs to be directed to only one of the outbound circuits, I applied the IP Policy route-map to that vlan. If we have to fail over to the other router for any reason, all traffic is outbound on that circuit.
I just don't understand why VRRP would be stopping the route-map from being used. Here is an example of the vlan setup that I was using to test tonight. interface ve 210 port-name "TestingIPPolicyRouting" ip address 192.168.18.1 255.255.255.248 ip policy route-map test-next-hop ip vrrp vrid 210 owner track-priority 20 ip-address 192.168.18.1 track-port e 1/2 track-port e 1/7 activate As soon as I apply the VRRP settings, my tests outbound are handled by the BGP next hops instead of the next-hop set in my route-map. As soon as I remove the VRRP settings, the next-hop from the route-map is applied to the outbound traffic. I hope someone will have an idea on what I can do to make this work, I need to have the vrrp ability to fail over to our secondary router. Thanks Joe On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Randy McAnally <[email protected]> wrote: > Dumb question maybe, but are you applying the same map to all VRRP > enabled routers? > > -- > Randy <http://www.fastserv.com/> > > *---------- Original Message -----------* > From: Joseph Hardeman <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:23:35 -0500 > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Policy based routing question > > > Ok, > > > > I now have a little more idea on what is causing my problems. Its VRRP > causing my ip policy route-map to not work. When I remove VRRP from a VLAN > I am testing with my route-map works properly but stops working when I > re-apply the VRRP Config. > > > > Any ideas on why VRRP would break a ip policy route-map? > > > > Thanks everyone > > > > Joe > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Joseph Hardeman > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> >> Hi Everyone, >> > >> > I have a question about Policy based routing. I have setup my >> access-list and route-map like the examples I have found online and also >> tried it with the example in a Manual I have for the Foundry. On a VLAN >> with multiple subnets its not working. I have all of the subnets included >> right now in the access-list I setup and I have set the next-hop in my >> route-map, but I can't seem to get it to send that traffic through the next >> hop I want too. It is instead using BGP routing to send the traffic out for >> these subnets. >> > >> > interface ve 200 >> > ip address a.a.a.a 255.255.255.128 >> > ip address b.b.b.b 255.255.255.128 >> > ip address c.c.c.c 255.255.255.0 >> > ip address d.d.d.d 255.255.255.128 >> > ip policy route-map test-next-hop >> > >> > access-list 30 permit a.a.a.a 0.0.0.127 >> > access-list 30 permit c.c.c.c 0.0.0.255 >> > access-list 30 permit b.b.b.b 0.0.0.127 >> > access-list 30 permit d.d.d.d 0.0.0.127 >> > access-list 30 permit e.e.e.e 0.0.0.127 >> > >> > route-map test-next-hop permit 10 >> > match ip address 30 >> > set ip next-hop z.z.z.z >> > >> > When I apply this route-map to a vlan with a single subnet it works just >> fine and is sending the outbound traffic to the next hop I told it to, just >> not on the vlan with multiple subnets. Anyone know why it might be having >> this problem? And how to fix it? >> > >> > Thanks for any insight or help. >> > >> > Joe >> > > > > *------- End of Original Message -------* >
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
