-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 And when we used the "secret command" we found that a legal disclaimer appeared in the config file. Interesting that you could potentially have to run each IOS upgrade past your legal department.
Todd Christell Manager Network Architecture and Support www.springnet.net 417.831.8688 Key fingerprint = 4F26 A0B4 5AAD 7FCA 48DD 7F40 A57E 9235 5202 D508 - -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tomasz Szewczyk Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 9:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [f-nsp] NetIron MLX-4 vs Juniper MX240 W dniu 2010-05-07 07:25, Vladimir Litovka pisze: > > what about MLX/XMR versus Cisco ASR9k? :-) You're free to use third party optics on MLX/XMR and MX. Try to do the same on ASR without hidden (unsupported) command... ;-) It's your choice to be free or... not to be :-) Moreover ASR seems to be "new born" platform so you need to think about bugs which may appear. The main advantage of XMR/MLX is price and port density with good functionality. If you have some more money to spent you can select more advanced platform like MX - which is really powerful also form functional point of view. Tomek _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 10.0.2 (Build 13) Charset: utf-8 wj8DBQFL5ClDpX6SNVIC1QgRAkYHAJ9aeJQ/tb12DRz4U5b99FpWEJunaQCeKLpt IEHTF1yNhCOPbOWAhX7zJ0g= =+72H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: Christell Todd.vcf>>
Christell Todd.vcf.sig
Description: Christell Todd.vcf.sig
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
