Just to clarify, since the later 3.x code, you do need the "no transceiver-type-check" on the MLX/XMR to use an unsupported SFP. We even had to use that command to use a Foundry branded SFP which was originally from another product line. I believe they since fixed that problem though in a later release.
-Vinny -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tomasz Szewczyk Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [f-nsp] NetIron MLX-4 vs Juniper MX240 W dniu 2010-05-07 07:25, Vladimir Litovka pisze: > > what about MLX/XMR versus Cisco ASR9k? :-) You're free to use third party optics on MLX/XMR and MX. Try to do the same on ASR without hidden (unsupported) command... ;-) It's your choice to be free or... not to be :-) Moreover ASR seems to be "new born" platform so you need to think about bugs which may appear. The main advantage of XMR/MLX is price and port density with good functionality. If you have some more money to spent you can select more advanced platform like MX - which is really powerful also form functional point of view. Tomek _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
