Hi Vinny, our first upgrade will take place on thursday morning, this week. So at the moment I can't say anything but I'am curious about the result.
-- Gerald (ax/tc) Am 17.01.11 19:13, schrieb Abello, Vinny: > Hi Gerald, > > Just wondering if you happened to upgrade to 5.1. We're actually running pre > 4.x code on our XMR's and would like to upgrade to fix a few bugs and gain > features. There are specific features only introduced in 5.1 that are very > attractive to me. Wondering if you've pulled the trigger yet and how 5.1 is > running in your environment. > > I also am wondering if there are any Hurricane Electric engineers on this > list. I know their backbone is largely based (if not entirely) on the XMR > platform, both from what I've read and having actually seen one of their > core routers in a cage we are both in. I was curious as to what code > revision they might be running as I'm sure they have extensive experience > with the XMR on their dual stack v4/v6 backbone. Plus I've rarely heard of > or have seen any major issues with Hurricane Electric so I'd assume they're > relatively happy with the code revision they are running. I might just ask > our Brocade rep if they'd be willing to find out and share that information > with us if possible. > > Vinny Abello > Network Engineer > Dell | Physician Services > office +1 973 940 6125 > mobile +1 973 868 0610 > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gerald Krause > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:51 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] XMR Software Upgrade Path from 4.0.1a > > Just FYI: as a summary of all on- and off-list receivend responses I'll > go for the 5.1 train. Thx! > > -- > Gerald (ax/tc) > > Am 11.01.2011 12:24, schrieb Gerald Krause: >> Hi, >> >> we have some XMRs in production, all with the older 4.0.1a code. The >> Systems are doing mainly L3 things like OSPF, BGP and VRRP within an >> IPv4/IPv6 dualstack environment but no *PLS or special L2 services at >> the moment. >> We plan to upgrade the systems with an newer software release and I >> wondering if there exist any arguments against using the latest 5.1 code? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Gerald (ax/tc) >> _______________________________________________ >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >> > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
